What's really happening?
DEAs have witnessed yet another round of announcements over the last couple of weeks from several of the larger well known Panels slashing EPC fees to a rough average of £50.
Whenever this happens, the Panels take a kicking. But there's a pattern developing here, and where there's a pattern, there's a theory...
It suddenly occurred to me the other day how fee-slashing news tends to generally happen in batches, over the course of a couple of weeks. What's more, the EPC Panels concerned are usually the same ones each time (although there may be others that just escape the limelight).
I think this latest round is the third or fourth one to follow this pattern, if memory serves me correctly.
Before I go on, I'm not in any way suggesting there's any collusion between Panels taking place, definitely not. But if we accept that, then it begs the question: Why do EPC fees get slashed by multiple Panels within a couple of weeks?
Following the money
There is a larger force at work here, methinks, and I have a theory. So I gets on the phone to one of the Panels and put that theory to them.
It seems I was right.
Connecting the dots
Take a look at my example flowchart diagram.
Let's suppose a large national Estate Agency awards a huge contract to a large national HIP provider to supply all its branches with HIPs.
In turn, said HIP provider divides that contract amongst EPC Panels across the country.
Get the picture?
The thumbscrews are turning
Question is, then: Who is pulling the strings here? The large Estate Agency, or the large HIP provider?
I don't know. I do know from the Panel I spoke to (who was, incidentally, happy to be named but I've made an editorial decision not to... just in case!) however, that to win their contract, they clearly did so by pricing on the volume of EPCs being offered.
Those volumes, so far at least, have not materialised. Yet Panels are still having the thumbscrews tightened.
Note: The above business model may apply to some, but not all Panels. Further, some Panels may have a portfolio of various work-channels. Therefore, no inference toward any one particular company should be made.
Posts: 6
Reply #3 on : Thu December 20, 2007, 13:13:47
Posts: 6
Reply #4 on : Fri December 21, 2007, 12:44:21
Posts: 6
Reply #5 on : Sun March 23, 2008, 06:24:18
Posts: 6
Reply #6 on : Tue July 15, 2008, 10:44:35
Posts: 6
Reply #7 on : Mon December 14, 2009, 17:04:11
Posts: 6
Reply #1 on : Thu December 20, 2007, 00:58:28