No case to answer on 3 counts
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has dismissed complaints from members of the public objecting to what they claimed was a misleading advert placed by Home Inspector Training Ltd (HIT), a sister company of HipHipHooray that sells training courses to prospective Domestic Energy Assessors and Home Inspectors.
The ASA received eleven complaints centred around three issues:
- ...exaggerated earnings potential for Home Inspectors (several complaints).
- ...that the subsidy would mean lower course fees (several complaints).
- ...that being available to work for Home Inspector Training's in-house company, and therefore qualify for a subsidy, entailed a four-year commitment (one complaint).
Exaggerated earnings potential for Home Inspectors
According to the ASA, HIT successfully defended the advertised earnings potential of Energy Assessors, arguing: "...they had quoted conservative figures below what their own Home Information Pack (HIP) Providing Company had been paying since the inception of the HIP legislation in August 2007. Home Inspector said the figure of "£80 to £120 for Energy Assessments" quoted in the ad was below the £100 to £160 their HIP Provider had paid their Energy Assessors since August and that they had no plans to reduce that fee."
On Home Inspector fees, Home Inspector Training Ltd said the figure of "£200 to £300 for optional Home Condition Reports" was the amount HipHipHooray had been paying since August and is expected to increase.
Training course subsidy
In defending complaints surrounding course subsidies if trainees agreed to accept work from HipHipHooray for a period of four years: HIT produced copies of invoices showing that some of its trainees had paid the full price for that course; others, the subsidised price.
Four year "handcuff" contract
On point 3, HIT retorted: "... everything was explained to potential trainees in a 45-minute, one-to-one interview and that no one was offered training on the spot. They said potential trainees were also required to sit an aptitude test and would be informed whether they had been offered a training place some time after the interview process. They said that, if interviewees were offered a training place, they would be required to visit Home Inspector Training Ltd's offices a second time in order to go through the details of the training on a one-to-one basis again before finally signing up for the course."
The ASA accepted the evidence from Home Inspector Training Ltd and dismissed all the complaints on all three counts.
Read full report at the ASA website: Home Information Training Ltd ruling.
Tags: business-news
Posts: 4
Reply #2 on : Tue November 11, 2008, 08:08:26
Posts: 4
Reply #3 on : Fri December 05, 2008, 08:54:38
Posts: 4
Reply #4 on : Thu February 18, 2010, 17:34:45
Posts: 4
Reply #1 on : Fri September 12, 2008, 17:46:25